ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Bridging the Heterogeneity of Myasthenia Gravis Severity Scores for Digital Twin Development.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Clinical trials with rigorously collected data, especially for rare diseases, provide opportunities for mathematical modeling of patient outcomes over time; however, building a larger data set from multiple trials faces the challenge of harmonization of outcome measures. To accurately model MG and predict individual patient trajectories, one requires integrating three primary data types: (i) Laboratory and medication data, (ii) Electronic Health Record (EHR) data (e.g., age, sex, years since diagnosis, BMI), (iii) Disease severity scores. Among these, MG severity scores are crucial for measuring disease progression from the patient's and clinical evaluator's perspectives. However, clinical studies often employ various scoring systems (e.g., ADL, QMG, MG-CE, MGQOL-15), making it challenging to determine the most reliable measure. In this study, we investigate the relationships among clinical outcome measures across multiple clinical studies. Our objective is to develop a robust "Myasthenia Gravis Portrait" that can be applied across diverse clinical studies. This standardized portrait will facilitate the creation of a virtual population of digital twins, enabling the application of machine learning techniques to a larger patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.