ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
SmokeBERT: A BERT-based Model for Quantitative Smoking History Extraction from Clinical Narratives to Improve Lung Cancer Screening.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tobacco use is a critical risk factor for diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disorders. While electronic health records can capture categorical smoking statuses accurately, granular quantitative details, such as pack years and years since quitting, are often embedded in clinical narratives. This information is crucial for assessing disease risk and determining eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). Existing natural language processing (NLP) tools excelled at identifying smoking statuses but struggled with extracting detailed quantitative data. To address this, we developed SmokeBERT, a fine-tuned BERT-based model optimized for extracting detailed smoking histories. Evaluations against a state-of-the-art rule-based NLP model demonstrated its superior performance on F1 scores (0.97 vs. 0.88 on the hold-out test set) and identification of LCS-eligible patients (e.g., 98% vs. 60% for ≥20 pack years). Future work includes creating a multilingual, language-agnostic version of SmokeBERT by incorporating datasets in multiple languages, exploring ensemble methods, and testing on larger datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.