Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585058›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Predicting mechanical ventilation duration in ICU patients: A data-driven machine learning approach for clinical decision-making.

Shivi Mendiratta, Vinay Gandhi Mukkelli, Esha Baidya Kayal, Puneet Khanna, Amit Mehndiratta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shivi MendirattaCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IITD), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3038-4268
Vinay Gandhi MukkelliDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6738-3167
Esha Baidya KayalCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IITD), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-826X
Puneet KhannaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-9963
Amit MehndirattaCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IITD), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-2462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation is essential in intensive care units (ICUs) but poses risks such as ventilator-associated complications and high costs. The accuracy of predicting mechanical ventilation duration using clinical information is limited. Predicting ventilation duration accurately can aid clinical decisions like resource-allocation and early tracheostomy-planning. Objective: To develop explainable artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting mechanical ventilation duration leveraging diverse clinical parameters from ICU patient data. Methodology: This development and testing study analysed 323 mechanically ventilated patients {(n = 323, Male:Female = 160:163, Age = 42.87 ± 19.54 years (mean ± standard deviation)} from three ICUs at AIIMS, Delhi. The dataset included 100-clinical parameters per patient. Two models were developed: (1) A regression model (n = 323) to predict ventilation duration in days, and (2) A classification model (n = 218, non-tracheostomized) to predict short- (≤3 days) vs. long-term (>3 days) ventilation requirements. The misclassification-cost was altered for the classification model. Feature selection was performed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) on a random forest model, and training was done with 5-fold cross-validation (80% training, 20% testing). Results: The least-squares boosting regression model achieved root mean squared error (RMSE) of 4.66 days and coefficient of Determination (R²) of 0.65 using 34-SHAP-selected features, with tracheostomy (53.66% importance) being the top predictor. The best classification model, K-nearest neighbours, achieved 79.1% accuracy, Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUROC) of 0.82, sensitivity of 71.4%, and specificity of 86.4% using 47-SHAP-selected features. Key predictors included ICU admission type (8.1%), PO Conclusion: AI-driven prediction of ventilation duration can enhance ICU workflows, optimize resource use, and improve personalized care. SHAP-based feature selection promotes AI interpretability, aiding clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Clinical decision makingexplainable AIintensive care unitmachine learningmechanical ventilationShapley additive explanations (SHAP)

Identifiers

PMID40585058
PMCPMC12202914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.