ArticleDigital health
Establishment and comparison of prediction models for early-stage diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of an explainable prediction model of favorable outcome under integrative medicine treatment exposure in DKD adult patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Association Between Short-Term Glycemic Variability Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Early Diabetic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The construction of a model to estimate patients' status in early-stage diabetic kidney disease (ES-DKD) is needed. Thus, the risk factors playing a role in the disease diagnosis can be determined when routine examination outcomes are collected. Objective: Routine examination outcomes can also be used to predict patients' ES-DKD. A first-stage study is conducted on how successful conventional statistical models (CSMs) perform when sample sizes are small when compared to machine learning methods (MLMs). Methods: A total of 268 observations were collected from two tertiary hospitals in Lanzhou with demographic information, basic medical history, and routine laboratory tests such as blood routine, common biochemical tests, and urine routine. Then, conventional statistical methods and MLMs are applied to establish models separately to determine optimal prediction models. In addition, machine learning has also been applied to establish fused models to explore new modeling methods. Results: The validation set can better represent the actual performance of the models in clinical practice. Therefore, the comparisons are made based on the predictive performance of the two methods using the validation set. Ultimately, it was concluded that the ensemble model outperforms in terms of performance metrics. The CSMs perform poorly in terms of area under curve values. Compared to various MLMs, the performance of others is not inferior. Conclusion: This article establishes multiple ES-DKD prediction models using CSMs and MLMs. New ideas and methods for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ES-DKD in clinical practice are presented. This article also compares two modeling methods. A comprehensive model was established, which has excellent predictive and generalization ability and stability. Therefore, the integration of the advantages of MLMs based on CSMs is a very fruitful attempt. Fused models have a high chance of being the main research direction for future research to develop better models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.