Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585021›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025

Focused Subspecialty Training in Plastic Surgery Residency: An Objective Assessment of the Cleveland Clinic Pilot Program.

Demetrius M Coombs, Steven L Bernard, Raymond Isakov, James E Zins

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven L Bernard
Raymond Isakov
James E Zins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many senior-level plastic surgery residents have a firm idea regarding the complexion of their future practice. Objectives: Rather than continuing with traditional rotations in the sixth year, it is suggested that chief residents have the option of a 6-month focused training experience in their final year of plastic surgery training. Methods: A pilot program of focused training in the subspecialty area of the chief resident's interest was initiated at our institution in July 2022. Areas of focus began with aesthetic surgery, whereas hand/microsurgery, gender-affirming, and craniofacial surgery were under development. Objective means of assessing the value of the resident's experience were developed, including blinded program surveys completed by participating and nonparticipating residents and attending surgeons, case log activity, and academic productivity. Results: Objective assessment demonstrated that the pilot was favorably received by all residents and participating staff. All residents expressed interest in participating during their chief year and requested the program continue. Furthermore, 10 (48%) residents were interested in pursuing a formal fellowship different than their focused training experience. Attendees unanimously agreed that the pilot offered a substantial advantage and improvement to the current residency training model and supported its continuation. Notably, there were no major criticisms, logistical problems, or administrative burdens encountered. Conclusions: Given the increasing complexity of plastic surgery practice and rising competition from other specialties, a focused training experience before postgraduate fellowship or formal practice may represent an alternative means of enhancing plastic surgery education. The current pilot attempts to test and objectify this concept. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic:

Identifiers

PMID40585021
PMCPMC12202876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.