ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Botulinum Toxin: Surely, We Can Do Better? Optimizing Results Beyond On-Label Techniques and Teaching.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aesthetic Improvements Over Time: Long-Term Efficacy and Additional Outcomes of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Simultaneous Treatment of Upper Facial Lines.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes Following Botulinum Toxin Treatment Using Multimodal Large Language Models: A Paired Before-and-After Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Lateral pretrichial subcutaneous brow lift with upper eyelid blepharoplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial expressions and their emotional attributes are essential as an adjunct to verbal communication and for nonverbal communication. Botulinum toxin (BoNTA) used to limit wrinkles induced by aging changes on expressive faces. However, suboptimal injection techniques can lead to undesirable outcomes, such as brow ptosis, unnatural eyebrow elevation, flattening of the cheeks, and unnatural smiles. It is the intention here to investigate whether "on-label" standard injection techniques may be a contributing factor to poor results. A consensus group convened in 2023 looked at the relevant anatomy, expressions induced, complications of on-label BoNTA treatment, solutions, and alternative treatments. Interrogation of databases was supplemented by expert opinion of the consensus group. The authors of this review found that anatomical variations, generic on-label injection patterns, and inadvertent muscle recruitment contribute to suboptimal outcomes. Undesirable outcomes included brow ptosis, unnatural eyebrow shape, smile pattern alteration, and cheek flattening. These were linked to on-label standard protocols that fail to address individual anatomy and functional variations. Adjustments in dose, depth, and injection placement, along with simultaneous treatment of linked or antagonistic muscles, were identified as critical solutions. To optimize outcomes, it is critical to tailor injection strategies respecting individual anatomical and functional differences. Many unnatural appearances seen after BoNTA seem to have their origin in on-label techniques suggested by manufacturers. Although on-label protocols have been useful as a guide, the authors feel it is time to move past these to account for patient-specific needs and anatomical nuances. In this review, the authors provide practical recommendations for improved injection techniques.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.