ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Outcomes and Complications of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Previous Cosmetic Augmentation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breast cancer screening challenges in women with breast augmentation: Evidence from a comprehensive health checkup program.Global health & medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast augmentation is a very popular cosmetic surgery-which may subsequently influence the technique and outcomes of breast reconstruction in the event of breast cancer. After mastectomy, several surgical approaches are available for this patient population. The authors of this study aim to systematically review the available methods, their associated complications, and patient satisfaction outcomes. A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database was conducted by structured search algorithms to identify relevant studies. Three reconstruction techniques were categorized, and related complications and outcomes were compiled into tables for analysis. A total of 11 studies on implant-based breast reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Three main surgical techniques were identified: tissue expander-to-implant (TE; Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.