ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2025
Evaluating Access to Neuropsychological Services for Individuals with Spina Bifida: Insights from the 2022 Provider Survey.
Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many people with spina bifida (SB) have congenital brain malformations and receive neurosurgical intervention that can impact cognitive, behavioral, and emotional functioning. The Spina Bifida Association's (SBA) guidelines for care recommend that people with SB have neuropsychology evaluations to assess cognitive, behavioral, and emotional functioning throughout their lifespan; however, people with SB anecdotally report having trouble finding and accessing such care. Objectives: The goal of this study was to gain information about neuropsychology services available to people with SB and identify possible barriers to care. Methods: Neuropsychologists in the United States were invited to complete a practice-focused survey created by members of the Spina Bifida Neuropsychology Collaborative (SBNC). The survey was emailed to professional neuropsychology listservs and directly to providers at the SBA Clinic Care Partner and National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) sites. Results: Responses from 34 neuropsychologists (representing 22 sites, including 40% of SBA Clinic Care Partner sites and 67% of NSBPR sites) indicated that multilingual SB-focused neuropsychology services are available within all regions of the United States. Comprehensive, outpatient evaluations are common; however, integration of neuropsychology services into inpatient settings and multidisciplinary clinics is limited. Respondents report that waitlist time is the most frequent barrier to neuropsychology care, followed by cost/insurance/payor type, travel/transportation difficulties, and limited referrals. Conclusion: There are considerable gaps in the currently available array of US-based neuropsychology services for individuals with SB. Neuropsychologists and SB clinical programs are encouraged to strategically increase availability of neuropsychological services and expand care options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.