Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584996›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Machine-learning-based integration of temporal and spectral prompt gamma-ray information for proton range verification.

Aaron Kieslich, Sonja M Schellhammer, Alex Zwanenburg, Toni Kögler, Steffen Löck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aaron KieslichOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Sonja M SchellhammerOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Alex ZwanenburgOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Toni KöglerOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Steffen LöckOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Prompt gamma-ray timing (PGT) and prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy (PGS) are non-invasive techniques for dose delivery monitoring in proton radiotherapy. Integrating PGT and PGS into a unified data analysis framework may improve proton range verification by incorporating both temporal and spectral information from prompt gamma-ray events. This study evaluates the effectiveness of this integration for enhancing the accuracy of proton range verification using machine-learning. Material and Methods: A homogeneous phantom was irradiated with 162 and 225 MeV static and scanned proton beams. Air cavities of 5, 10 and 20 mm were introduced to simulate anatomical variations. The energy and time of arrival of prompt gamma rays were measured using a PGT detector. 2-dimensional time-energy spectra were extracted for 1,440 proton spots. Different feature sets (energy-only, time-only, energy-restricted time, image) were computed. These feature sets were used by four different machine-learning models to predict range shifts. Model performance was assessed using the root mean square error (RMSE). Results: Time-only and combined time-energy feature sets exhibited good performance with RMSE values of 3 to 4 mm, consistent with previously developed models. Energy-only and image features led to poorer performance with RMSE values exceeding 5 mm. The integration of energy-only features did not improve prediction accuracy compared to exclusively using time-only features. Conclusion: While spectral information did not contribute additional value for determining proton beam range shifts in the investigated setup, the findings show that temporal information alone is sufficient to perform accurate proton range verification.

Indexed as

Machine learningMultivariate modellingPrompt gamma-ray timingProton radiotherapyTreatment verification

Identifiers

PMID40584996
PMCPMC12198029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.