ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Patient-specific deep learning tracking for real-time 2D pancreas localisation in kV-guided radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Motion Management in Particle Therapy: Evolution, Challenges, and AI-Enabled Opportunities.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: In pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), accurate motion management is crucial for the safe delivery of high doses per fraction. Intra-fraction tracking with magnetic resonance imaging-guidance for gated SBRT has shown potential for improved local control. Visualisation of pancreas (and surrounding organs) remains challenging in intra-fraction kilo-voltage (kV) imaging, requiring implanted fiducials. In this study, we investigate patient-specific deep-learning approaches to track the gross-tumour-volume (GTV), pancreas-head and the whole-pancreas in intra-fraction kV images. Materials and methods: Conditional-generative-adversarial-networks were trained and tested on data from 25 patients enrolled in an ethics-approved pancreatic SBRT trial for contour prediction on intra-fraction 2D kV images. Labelled digitally-reconstructed-radiographs (DRRs) were generated from contoured planning-computed-tomography (CTs) (CT-DRRs) and cone-beam-CTs (CBCT-DRRs). A population model was trained using CT-DRRs of 19 patients. Two patient-specific model types were created for six additional patients by fine-tuning the population model using CBCT-DRRs (CBCT-models) or CT-DRRs (CT-models) acquired in exhale-breath-hold. Model predictions on unseen triggered-kV images from the corresponding six patients were evaluated against projected-contours using Dice-Similarity-Coefficient (DSC), centroid-error (CE), average Hausdorff-distance (AHD), and Hausdorff-distance at 95th-percentile (HD95). Results: The mean ± 1SD (standard-deviation) DSCs were 0.86 ± 0.09 (CBCT-models) and 0.78 ± 0.12 (CT-models). For AHD and CE, the CBCT-model predicted contours within 2.0 mm ≥90.3 % of the time, while HD95 was within 5.0 mm ≥90.0 % of the time, and had a prediction time of 29.2 ± 3.7 ms per contour. Conclusion: The patient-specific CBCT-models outperformed the CT-models and predicted the three contours with 90th-percentile error ≤2.0 mm, indicating the potential for clinical real-time application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.