Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584991›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2025

Longitudinal Analysis of the Deep Brain Stimulation Impairment Scale for Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Paula Broetzmann, Carolin Semmler, Hannah Jergas, Gregor A Brandt, Christina van der Linden, Charlotte Schedlich-Teufer, Franziska Maier, Elke Kalbe, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Michael T Barbe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paula BroetzmannDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Carolin SemmlerDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hannah JergasDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gregor A BrandtDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christina van der LindenDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Charlotte Schedlich-TeuferDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Franziska MaierDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Elke KalbeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Veerle Visser-VandewalleDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael T BarbeDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Juan Carlos BaldermannDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established treatment for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). However, some patients treated with DBS may still experience quality of life limiting impairments after surgery, e.g., concerning posture and gait, cognition, speech, apathy or impulsivity, as well as technical challenges in managing the implanted device. The Deep Brain Stimulation Impairment Scale (DBS-IS) was developed to assess these impairments, yet their postoperative development is underexplored. Methods: We retrospectively analysed changes in the DBS-IS Total Score and subscales assessed in patients at baseline, three, six and twelve months post-DBS implantation (n = 33 PwP) using linear mixed models for repeated measurements. Furthermore, we investigated device-related issues within the first year after surgery and their impact on quality of life in a larger sample (n = 99 PwP) using DBS-IS Facility Scores. Results: After surgery we observed significant improvement in the DBS-IS Total Score (β = -1.93; p = 0.005), particularly in the subscales of postural instability, gait difficulty and cognitive impairment. 43 % of patients reported device-related problems within one year after surgery. Patients with device-related problems showed significantly less improvement in quality of life (z = -2.40; p = 0.017). Exploratory post-hoc tests suggested a higher propensity for device-related complications among older individuals (z = -2.19; p = 0.029). Conclusion: The majority of impairments evaluated by the DBS-IS, such as postural instability, gait difficulty and cognitive impairments, appear amenable to STN-DBS intervention. Special attention is warranted for potential device issues, especially in older patients, to optimize patients' quality of life outcomes.

Indexed as

DBSDBS-Impairment ScaleDBS-ISDeep Brain StimulationQuality of lifeSTN-DBS

Identifiers

PMID40584991
PMCPMC12206121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.