ArticleEJIFCC2025
A National e-Survey of Adult Reference Intervals of Routine Chemistry Analytes Used by Laboratories Across Pakistan: A Step Towards Harmonization.
Article in EJIFCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the variation of reference intervals, reporting units used for key blood chemistry parameters in laboratories across Pakistan and to understand the factors contributing to these discrepancies. Methodology: A comprehensive e-questionnaire developed using google forms covering key blood chemistry parameters (Electrolytes, fasting glucose, glucose random urea, creatinine and lipid profile), reference intervals, reporting units, and laboratory practices was administered via email to the Pathologists. Frequency and percentages were calculated for each response and descriptive results were also evaluated. Result: A total of 38 responses were received five responses were excluded due to incomplete forms. The responses from 33 laboratories revealed substantial variability in reference intervals (RIs) for routine blood chemistry parameters, underscoring a significant lack of standardization. 66.66% laboratories had not developed specific RIs, relying instead on manufacturer-provided RIs, with infrequent reviews or updates. Challenges were prevalent due to non-harmonized RIs, leading to patient and physician counseling issues. Primary obstacles included funding deficiencies and limited access to healthy samples. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the critical need for national regulatory guidelines to standardize RIs, thereby enhancing the reliability and accuracy of laboratory diagnostics in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40584990PMC12205144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.