Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584990›Full record

ArticleEJIFCC2025

A National e-Survey of Adult Reference Intervals of Routine Chemistry Analytes Used by Laboratories Across Pakistan: A Step Towards Harmonization.

Nayab Afzal, Hijab Batool, Saba Raza, Salma Ayub, Sibgha Bashir, Asma Hayat, Khushbakht Adnan, Siraj Muneer, Ghazanfar Abbas, Sahar Iqbal and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJIFCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nayab AfzalSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hijab BatoolDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Saba RazaDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Salma AyubDepartment of Chemical Pathology, SIUT Karachi, Pakistan.
Sibgha BashirShahida Islam Medical and Dental College, Lodhran, Pakistan.
Asma HayatDepartment of Chemical Pathology and Endocrinology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Khushbakht AdnanDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Bolan Medical College, Quetta, Pakistan.
Siraj MuneerClinical Laboratory, Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ghazanfar AbbasDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sahar IqbalDepartment of Pathology, Dow International Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kiran ImranDepartment of Chemical Pathology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohsin ShafiDepartment of Pathology, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Sibtain AhmedSection of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the variation of reference intervals, reporting units used for key blood chemistry parameters in laboratories across Pakistan and to understand the factors contributing to these discrepancies. Methodology: A comprehensive e-questionnaire developed using google forms covering key blood chemistry parameters (Electrolytes, fasting glucose, glucose random urea, creatinine and lipid profile), reference intervals, reporting units, and laboratory practices was administered via email to the Pathologists. Frequency and percentages were calculated for each response and descriptive results were also evaluated. Result: A total of 38 responses were received five responses were excluded due to incomplete forms. The responses from 33 laboratories revealed substantial variability in reference intervals (RIs) for routine blood chemistry parameters, underscoring a significant lack of standardization. 66.66% laboratories had not developed specific RIs, relying instead on manufacturer-provided RIs, with infrequent reviews or updates. Challenges were prevalent due to non-harmonized RIs, leading to patient and physician counseling issues. Primary obstacles included funding deficiencies and limited access to healthy samples. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the critical need for national regulatory guidelines to standardize RIs, thereby enhancing the reliability and accuracy of laboratory diagnostics in Pakistan.

Indexed as

clinical chemistryharmonizationPakistanreference intervalssurvey

Identifiers

PMID40584990
PMCPMC12205144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.