Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584974›Full record

ReviewPalliative care and social practice2025

Patients' and caregivers' experiences of familial and social support in resource-poor settings: A systematically constructed review and meta-synthesis.

Yakubu Salifu, Emmanuel Ekpor, Jonathan Bayuo, Samuel Akyirem, Kennedy Nkhoma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yakubu SalifuDivision of Health Research, International Observatory on End of Life Care (IOELC), Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-3010
Emmanuel EkporSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-4135
Jonathan BayuoSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Samuel AkyiremYale School of Nursing, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA.
Kennedy NkhomaCicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-8160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Familial and social support for patients with life-limiting conditions is crucial, especially in resource-poor settings. However, limited knowledge exists about patients' and caregivers' experiences within these informal networks in such contexts. Aims: This systematic review aimed to (i) synthesise the experiences of patients and caregivers regarding familial and social support in resource-poor settings, and (ii) understand the challenges they face in order to provide evidence for more compassionate, culturally congruent palliative care. Design: Systematic review and meta-synthesis registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023486219). Methods: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus using keywords such as "familial and social support" and "chronic debilitating conditions" in low- and middle-income countries. Only English-language qualitative studies exploring familial and social support were included. Thomas and Harden's approach was used for data synthesis, and the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklist was used to assess the studies' quality. Results: We report our findings using the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidelines. Following screening, 39 studies were retained from 9157 search results. Five key themes emerged: (1) Bearing the weight of financial strain; (2) Psychosocial support as a "lifeline" for care; (3) Hands-on help and guidance; (4) Cultural and social obligations; and (5) Developing a "thick skin" and having faith as a coping mechanism. The findings show that caregiving in the context of life-limiting illnesses is influenced by financial burdens, emotional challenges, and cultural obligations, with caregivers depending on spiritual and social networks. However, resource availability is inconsistent, underscoring the need for tailored interventions. Conclusion: Culturally specific palliative care strategies are necessary to ease caregiver burdens, improve resource distribution, and support the well-being of patients and caregivers in resource-poor settings.

Indexed as

familial supportlife-limiting conditionsmeta-synthesispalliative careresource-poor settingssocial support

Identifiers

PMID40584974
PMCPMC12205196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.