ReviewSkin health and disease2025
Oral and topical vitamin D treatment strategies in psoriasis.
Review in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Microneedle-Nanocarrier Platforms Deliver True Tolerogenic Immunotherapy for Psoriasis?Vaccines · 2026Review
- DoE-oriented optimization of a chitosan-based nanoemulgel of clobetasol propionate for therapeutic intervention in psoriasis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- A Molecular-Dynamics-Guided Screening Pipeline Identifies Topical Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulators with Selective Epidermal Activation.Skin pharmacology and physiology · 2026Article
- Calcium signaling in psoriasis: from pathogenesis to therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a prevalent skin disorder affecting approximately 2-3% of the population in the USA. Its complex and varied presentations necessitate a diverse range of available therapeutic options. While topical corticosteroid therapy is conventionally employed as first-line treatment, long-term usage increases the risk of adverse events, prompting the consideration of alternatives including steroid-sparing agents such as vitamin D. In this article, we review literature from topical and oral vitamin D trials for the treatment of psoriasis. Topically, vitamin D analogues have been well established as an effective long-term treatment, particularly when used in combination with other therapies. Moreover, combination therapy with immunomodulators such as apremilast and methotrexate has shown promise as well. Conversely, oral vitamin D supplementation trials have yielded more inconsistent results, with some supplementation clinical trials showing significant psoriasis resolution and others showing no significant changes in psoriasis outcome. Vitamin D deficiency status, seasonal variation and body mass index were factors that may have modulated the therapeutic effect of vitamin D supplementation. Further study combining vitamin D supplementation with pre-existing treatments may also augment the effect of monotherapy. Studies on the synergistic effects of combination therapies with oral vitamin D or the development of foam-based or microneedle drug delivery systems may be promising next steps.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.