Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584945›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2025

Skin cancer screening practices of UK hairdressers and barbers for their customers: a preliminary study.

Helen Fleming, Chris Wells, Andrew Williams, Rebecca Stores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen FlemingSchool of Dental, Health & Care Professions Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-5652
Chris WellsSchool of Dental, Health & Care Professions Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Andrew WilliamsSchool of Health & Rehabilitation Science, Health Sciences University, Bournemouth, UK.
Rebecca StoresSchool of Dental, Health & Care Professions Faculty of Science and Health, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Head-and-neck skin cancers have a worse prognosis than those that develop elsewhere on the body. Self-screening this area for suspicious skin changes can be difficult. Hairdressers and barbers observe this area closely during hair appointments and could bring their customers' attention to suspicious skin changes earlier. Objectives: To investigate a sample of UK hairdressers' and barbers' skin cancer education, customer screening practices and influences on screening, and to compare hairdressers' and barbers' screening practices. Methods: Stratified random sampling was utilized to select hairdressers and barbers working in a UK city. Participants were invited to complete a survey. Results: Thirty-seven participants completed the survey. Five per cent reported having had skin cancer awareness training and 24% were screening customers. Thirty-five per cent had advised a customer of a suspicious mole or skin lesion; of these participants, 39% had had customers diagnosed with skin cancer. 'Not having received training' was reported by 65% of participants as a deterrent to screening. Knowing someone who had experienced skin cancer was significantly associated with screening and advising customers of suspicious skin changes. Most participants (92%) indicated they would like, or maybe like, skin cancer awareness training. Conclusions: In this UK city study, perceived knowledge of the signs and symptoms of skin cancer appeared to arise from knowing someone who had experienced skin cancer rather than formal training. Lack of skin cancer education was a deterrent to screening, but most participants would like training. Trained hairdressers and barbers could potentially provide regular head-and-neck skin screening for customers.

Identifiers

PMID40584945
PMCPMC12202860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.