Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584928›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025

Medication Utilization at a Provincial Remand Centre.

Caitlin Olatunbosun, Kory Sloan, Laura Miskimins, Hazel Gabert, Rekha Jabbal, Catherine Biggs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin OlatunbosunBSP, ACPR, MPH, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.
Kory SloanBSc(Pharm), is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.
Laura MiskiminsRPhT, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.
Hazel GabertBCom, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.
Rekha JabbalBSc(Pharm), is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.
Catherine BiggsBSc(Pharm), is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of medication utilization highlights health needs and facilitates rational drug use in a population. Data on medication utilization in correctional facilities are limited. Objective: To describe the types and volumes of medications used at a provincial remand centre, by drug schedule and therapeutic classification. Methods: In this retrospective review of medications used at the Edmonton Remand Centre over a 1-year period (September 2022 to August 2023), the data were analyzed descriptively. Data were compared by sex and age using the unpaired 2-sided Results: Of 8772 persons admitted to the remand centre during the study period, 6296 (71.8%) had medication orders. Of these, 5446 (86.5%) had orders for over-the-counter medications, 5591 (88.8%) for prescription medications, and 2513 (39.9%) for narcotics. Patients 40 years of age or younger had proportionally more orders for narcotic medications. The therapeutic classes with the highest proportions of patients were those for treating mental health problems, substance use disorder, pain, constipation, and infectious diseases. Conclusions: Most patients in this corrections facility were receiving medications. Utilization trends specific to the corrections setting should be considered to support patient care.

Indexed as

correctional health caremedicationmedication utilizationpharmacyremand centre

Identifiers

PMID40584928
PMCPMC12204709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.