ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Evaluation of ground based spectral imaging for real time maize biomass monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although point measurements of water management properties have become increasingly common, understanding the spatial heterogeneity of agricultural fields remains critical for advancing precision agriculture. Spectral analysis provides a non-destructive approach to evaluating plant biophysical properties, such as chlorophyll and carotenoids, which are critical for precision agriculture. This study addresses the challenge of precise plant trait prediction by integrating proximal sensing data with biomass observations to inform more effective water management strategies. This study predicts carotenoid and chlorophyll content from NDVI, and estimates dry and wet biomass from vegetation cover using multispectral Tetracam data. A key novel aspect of this study lies in the pioneering integration of proximal sensing with biomass information to improve the estimation of plant properties, offering practical applications for precision agriculture. The diagnostic results demonstrated varying model performances. The carotenoid prediction model, with a moderate R² (0.54), exhibited a slight overestimation, characterized by a Mean Bias Error (MBE) of 0.02 µg/g and a Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) of 17%. Conversely, the chlorophyll prediction model showed improved accuracy, achieving an R² of 0.64, an MBE of 0.04 µg/g, and an NRMSE of 15.92%. Models predicting wet and dry biomass from vegetation cover yielded comparable performances, with R² values of 0.55 and 0.58, and low NRMSEs of 13.26% and 15.06%, respectively. These findings underscore the potential of combining proximal sensing and biomass data to enhance the prediction of plant properties, providing valuable insights for optimizing precision agriculture through machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.