Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584836›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of an MRI spatiotemporal interaction model for early noninvasive prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer: a multicentre study.

Wenjie Tang, Chen Jin, Qingcong Kong, Chunling Liu, Siyi Chen, Shishen Ding, Bihua Liu, Zaihui Feng, Ying Li, Yi Dai and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multicenter study provides radiomic and biological insights into neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and prognosis in luminal breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wenjie TangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Chen JinCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China.
Qingcong KongDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Chunling LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People' Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, 510080, China.
Siyi ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Shishen DingDepartment of Radiology, Liuzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, 545006, China.
Bihua LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Gongguan People's Hospital), China.
Zaihui FengDepartment of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Honghe, 661000, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Honghe, 661000, China.
Yi DaiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518036, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, MD, 21201, USA.
Yongxin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Xiaorui HanDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Dandan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Zijin WengDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Weifeng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Xinhua WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Xinqing JiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Qianwei ZhouCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China.
Ning MaoDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, 264000, China.
Yuan GuoDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accurate and early evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and minimizing unnecessary interventions. While deep learning (DL)-based approaches have shown promise in medical imaging analysis, existing models often fail to comprehensively integrate spatial and temporal tumor dynamics. This study aims to develop and validate a spatiotemporal interaction (STI) model based on longitudinal MRI data to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to NAC in breast cancer patients. Methods: This study included retrospective and prospective datasets from five medical centers in China, collected from June 2018 to December 2024. These datasets were assigned to the primary cohort (including training and internal validation sets), external validation cohorts, and a prospective validation cohort. DCE-MRI scans from both pre-NAC (T0) and early-NAC (T1) stages were collected for each patient, along with surgical pathology results. A Siamese network-based STI model was developed, integrating spatial features from tumor segmentation with temporal dependencies using a transformer-based multi-head attention mechanism. This model was designed to simultaneously capture spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics, enabling accurate prediction of NAC response. The STI model's performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Precision-Recall curve (AP), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, the I-SPY1 and I-SPY2 datasets were used for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and to explore the biological basis of the STI model, respectively. The prospective cohort was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Centre (ChiCTR2500102170). Findings: A total of 1044 patients were included in this study, with the pCR rate ranging from 23.8% to 35.9%. The STI model demonstrated good performance in early prediction of NAC response in breast cancer. In the external validation cohorts, the AUC values were 0.923 (95% CI: 0.859-0.987), 0.892 (95% CI: 0.821-0.963), and 0.913 (95% CI: 0.835-0.991), all outperforming the single-timepoint T0 or T1 models, as well as models with spatial information added (all p < 0.05, Delong test). Additionally, the STI model significantly outperformed the clinical model (p < 0.05, Delong test) and radiologists' predictions. In the prospective validation cohort, the STI model identified 90.2% (37/41) of non-pCR and 82.6% (19/23) of pCR patients, reducing misclassification rates by 58.7% and 63.3% compared to radiologists. This indicates that these patients might benefit from treatment adjustment or continued therapy in the early NAC stage. Survival analysis showed a significant correlation between the STI model and both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients. Further investigation revealed that favorable NAC responses predicted by the STI model were closely linked to upregulated immune-related genes and enhanced immune cell infiltration. Interpretation: Our study established a novel noninvasive STI model that integrates the spatiotemporal evolution of MRI before and during NAC to achieve early and accurate pCR prediction, offering potential guidance for personalized treatment. Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82302314, 62271448, 82171920, 81901711), Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515110792, 2023A1515220097, 2024A1515010653), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2023073, A2024116), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (2023A04J1275, 2024A03J1030, 2025A03J4163, 2025A03J4162); Guangzhou First People's Hospital Frontier Medical Technology Project (QY-C04).

Indexed as

Breast cancerDeep learningEarly predictionLongitudinal MRINeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID40584836
PMCPMC12205660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.