ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Machine learning-based viewers' preference prediction on social awareness advertisements using EEG.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: One of the most promising applications of neuromarketing is to predict true consumer preference for advertisements to quantify their efficacy. Researchers have already established such neuromarketing systems for static advertisements and e-commerce products. However, more research is required to develop such a system for dynamic advertisements. In this study, we predicted consumer preference for awareness advertisements and explored neural clues that may generate new insights on how we can evaluate advertisements using neuromarketing techniques. Methods: We took 4 awareness topics and selected 2 advertisements from each topic, using 2 types of storytelling ('shock' and 'comic'), giving us a total of 8 advertisements. We prepared a custom 14-channel EEG dataset of 20 individuals watching these ads, along with their preferences and other self-reported measures. Machine learning was used to perform binary classification on viewers' preferences. Additionally, other markers, such as engagement index and alpha activity, were studied. Result: The highest average accuracy of 72% was achieved using the leave-one-ad-out method. Further analysis shows that the engagement index (beta/alpha + theta) or (beta/alpha) is an important indicator of self-reported ratings for these advertisements, which have been reported previously. Discussion: Our ML model outperforms the current state of the art in terms of model accuracy. Additionally, awareness advertisements were used for the first time for such a task since these advertisements are free from any sort of product or brand bias. This ensures that the preferences of the advertisements were solely on the design and storytelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.