Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584798›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Co-existent Uterovaginal and Rectal Prolapse Management: A Case Series.

Manasi Deoghare, N Nisha, Rajesh Kumari, J B Sharma, Ashita Aggarwal, Muntaha Khan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manasi DeoghareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.
N NishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.
Rajesh KumariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-9970
J B SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.
Ashita AggarwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.
Muntaha KhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 728, 7 th Floor, Mother and Child Block, New Delhi, 110029 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The simultaneous occurrence of uterovaginal and rectal prolapse, i.e. dual prolapse, is uncommon. However, these two conditions can be managed concurrently through a combination of perineal, abdominal and laparoscopic approaches. In this article, we present a series of four cases wherein a perineal approach was utilized successfully. Method: All 4 patients had varying degrees of uterine prolapse, cystocele and rectocele along with external rectal prolapse. They all had completed their families and provided consent for hysterectomy. One patient underwent vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor repair along with the Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse, while the remaining three patients had vaginal hysterectomy and anterior colporrhaphy and posterior colpoperineorrhaphy with levatorplasty. Results: Follow-up evaluation 6 months after surgery revealed complete resolution of symptoms with no vault prolapse and rectal prolapse on examination. It is worth noting that all surgeries were performed under spinal anaesthesia, making this approach suitable for candidates who are at high risk during general anaesthesia, thereby allowing for simultaneous treatment of uterovaginal and rectal prolapse via perineal repair techniques. Also, assistance from surgeons was taken only in one case where Delorme procedure was performed, and in rest 3 cases, satisfactory surgical outcomes were seen following a good posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. Conclusion: Concomitant repair of both uterovaginal and rectal prolapse can be successfully performed by combining vaginal hysterectomy along with a good posterior colpoperineorrhaphy or Delorme procedure under spinal anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Delorme procedureDual prolapsePosterior colpoperineorrhaphyRectal prolapseUterovaginal prolapseVaginal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID40584798
PMCPMC12204969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.