ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025
Co-existent Uterovaginal and Rectal Prolapse Management: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The simultaneous occurrence of uterovaginal and rectal prolapse, i.e. dual prolapse, is uncommon. However, these two conditions can be managed concurrently through a combination of perineal, abdominal and laparoscopic approaches. In this article, we present a series of four cases wherein a perineal approach was utilized successfully. Method: All 4 patients had varying degrees of uterine prolapse, cystocele and rectocele along with external rectal prolapse. They all had completed their families and provided consent for hysterectomy. One patient underwent vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic floor repair along with the Delorme procedure for rectal prolapse, while the remaining three patients had vaginal hysterectomy and anterior colporrhaphy and posterior colpoperineorrhaphy with levatorplasty. Results: Follow-up evaluation 6 months after surgery revealed complete resolution of symptoms with no vault prolapse and rectal prolapse on examination. It is worth noting that all surgeries were performed under spinal anaesthesia, making this approach suitable for candidates who are at high risk during general anaesthesia, thereby allowing for simultaneous treatment of uterovaginal and rectal prolapse via perineal repair techniques. Also, assistance from surgeons was taken only in one case where Delorme procedure was performed, and in rest 3 cases, satisfactory surgical outcomes were seen following a good posterior colpoperineorrhaphy. Conclusion: Concomitant repair of both uterovaginal and rectal prolapse can be successfully performed by combining vaginal hysterectomy along with a good posterior colpoperineorrhaphy or Delorme procedure under spinal anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.