ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025
Human Embryo Quality Assessment with Deep Learning Models.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Schizophrenia Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks on EEG Data.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Embryo quality assessment plays a pivotal role in assisted reproductive technology (ART) for selecting viable embryos for implantation. Accurate evaluation is essential for improving success rates in fertility treatments. Traditional assessment methods rely on subjective visual grading by embryologists, which can lead to inconsistencies. The application of deep learning in this domain offers the potential for objective and reproducible assessments. Materials and Methods: This study investigates the use of deep learning models to classify embryo images as good or not good at the day-3 and day-5 stages. A dataset obtained from Hung Vuong Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City was used to train and evaluate four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures: VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetV2. Performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, and recall, were used to assess model effectiveness. Results: Among the tested models, EfficientNetV2 demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 95.26%, a precision of 96.30%, and a recall of 97.25%. These results indicate that deep learning models, particularly EfficientNetV2, can provide highly accurate and consistent assessments of embryo quality. Conclusion: The high classification accuracy of EfficientNetV2 underscores its potential as a valuable tool for fertility specialists. By offering objective and consistent evaluations, this approach can enhance fertility treatment efficiency and support prospective parents in their reproductive journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.