Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584797›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2025

Human Embryo Quality Assessment with Deep Learning Models.

Maryam Kalatehjari, Younes Ghasemi, Shaghayegh Mahmoudiandehkordi, Fatemeh Afrazeh, Hossein Abbasi, Fariba Ghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam KalatehjariReproductive Sciences and Sexual Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Younes GhasemiTehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Shaghayegh MahmoudiandehkordiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh AfrazehSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein AbbasiSouth Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Fariba GhasemiIslamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Embryo quality assessment plays a pivotal role in assisted reproductive technology (ART) for selecting viable embryos for implantation. Accurate evaluation is essential for improving success rates in fertility treatments. Traditional assessment methods rely on subjective visual grading by embryologists, which can lead to inconsistencies. The application of deep learning in this domain offers the potential for objective and reproducible assessments. Materials and Methods: This study investigates the use of deep learning models to classify embryo images as good or not good at the day-3 and day-5 stages. A dataset obtained from Hung Vuong Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City was used to train and evaluate four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures: VGG-19, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetV2. Performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, and recall, were used to assess model effectiveness. Results: Among the tested models, EfficientNetV2 demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 95.26%, a precision of 96.30%, and a recall of 97.25%. These results indicate that deep learning models, particularly EfficientNetV2, can provide highly accurate and consistent assessments of embryo quality. Conclusion: The high classification accuracy of EfficientNetV2 underscores its potential as a valuable tool for fertility specialists. By offering objective and consistent evaluations, this approach can enhance fertility treatment efficiency and support prospective parents in their reproductive journey.

Indexed as

CNNDeep learningEmbryo viability predictionTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40584797
PMCPMC12205116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.