Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584747›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025

Well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy showed smaller fetal biometry and neonatal birth weight compared to other glycemic disorders and healthy pregnancies: a comparative cohort study.

Christian Reguera-Hernández, Jonathan Valdez-González, Arnulfo Garza-Silva, Iván Francisco Fernández-Chau, Larissa Annet Moreno-Estrada, Carolina Garza-Rodríguez, Arnulfo González-Cantú, Miguel Ángel Sanz-Sánchez, Andrea Rivera-Cavazos, Maria Elena Romero-Ibarguengoitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian Reguera-HernándezTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Jonathan Valdez-GonzálezGynecology Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Arnulfo Garza-SilvaTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Iván Francisco Fernández-ChauTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Larissa Annet Moreno-EstradaTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Carolina Garza-RodríguezTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Arnulfo González-CantúTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Miguel Ángel Sanz-SánchezTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Andrea Rivera-CavazosTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.
Maria Elena Romero-IbarguengoitiaTeaching and Research Department, Hospital Clínica Nova, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo Léon México.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-4043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare differences in fetal biometry and obstetric outcomes between healthy pregnant women (group 1) vs. those with prediabetes (group 2), type 2 diabetes mellitus (group 3), and gestational diabetes (group 4) with an adequate metabolic control throughout their pregnancy at a hospital in Northern Mexico. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including pregnant women evaluated between 2021 and 2023. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) for biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and estimated fetal weight (EFW) during the second and third trimesters. Obstetric outcomes were also evaluated. Results: A total of 476 pregnant women were included: 268 in group 1, 88 in group 2, 13 in group 3, and 62 in group 4. Groups 2 and 3 had median HbA1c levels below 6.3% in the three trimesters. No significant differences were observed in the AUC calculated for the EFW, AC, FL, BPD, and AFI. However, women with T2DM had a smaller effect size for AUC of the EFW, FL, and BPD than other groups (Cohen's d = 0.20, d = 0.22, d = 0.26, respectively). The Cohen's d of neonatal birth weight was 0.22 for the prediabetes group, 0.27 for the T2DM group, and 0.12 for the GDM group. No difference was observed in obstetric outcomes. Conclusions: Fetuses of women with T2DM showed smaller AUC values for fetal biometric parameters and neonatal birth weight compared to those of healthy women, even when adequate metabolic control was achieved, in a population with a high prevalence of metabolic disorders.

Indexed as

Fetal developmentGestational diabetesPrediabetic statePrenatal ultrasonographyType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40584747
PMCPMC12202263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.