ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy showed smaller fetal biometry and neonatal birth weight compared to other glycemic disorders and healthy pregnancies: a comparative cohort study.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare differences in fetal biometry and obstetric outcomes between healthy pregnant women (group 1) vs. those with prediabetes (group 2), type 2 diabetes mellitus (group 3), and gestational diabetes (group 4) with an adequate metabolic control throughout their pregnancy at a hospital in Northern Mexico. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including pregnant women evaluated between 2021 and 2023. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) for biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and estimated fetal weight (EFW) during the second and third trimesters. Obstetric outcomes were also evaluated. Results: A total of 476 pregnant women were included: 268 in group 1, 88 in group 2, 13 in group 3, and 62 in group 4. Groups 2 and 3 had median HbA1c levels below 6.3% in the three trimesters. No significant differences were observed in the AUC calculated for the EFW, AC, FL, BPD, and AFI. However, women with T2DM had a smaller effect size for AUC of the EFW, FL, and BPD than other groups (Cohen's d = 0.20, d = 0.22, d = 0.26, respectively). The Cohen's d of neonatal birth weight was 0.22 for the prediabetes group, 0.27 for the T2DM group, and 0.12 for the GDM group. No difference was observed in obstetric outcomes. Conclusions: Fetuses of women with T2DM showed smaller AUC values for fetal biometric parameters and neonatal birth weight compared to those of healthy women, even when adequate metabolic control was achieved, in a population with a high prevalence of metabolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.