Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584739›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Evaluation of falls detected by natural language processing algorithm and not coded external cause of morbidity.

Daniel J Hekman, Apoorva P Maru, Hanna J Barton, Douglas Wiegmann, Manish N Shah, Amy L Cochran, Erkin Ötleş, Brian W Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel J HekmanBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-9501
Apoorva P MaruBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-6446
Hanna J BartonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0457-1153
Douglas WiegmannDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-9853
Manish N ShahBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
Amy L CochranDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-796X
Erkin ÖtleşBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-6832
Brian W PattersonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-3808

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS027735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults. Common methods for identifying fall-related ED visits within both claims and electronic health record datasets rely on diagnosis code-based definitions, which underestimate the true prevalence of falls. This study applies a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to ED provider notes to identify patients presenting due to falls and compares the characteristics of NLP-identified cases to those identified through diagnosis codes to identify the impact of identification strategy. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed ED encounter data from older adult patients who visited an ED between December 2016 and 2020. The NLP algorithm identified falls based on provider notes, searching for keywords related to falls and excluding negated and spurious matches. We also applied common ICD code methods to identify falls. Results: We processed 50 153 ED encounters and the NLP approach identified 14 604 encounters for patients who fell. Of those, 7086 (49%) were not identified using external cause of morbidity ICD codes. Patients identified by just the NLP algorithm exhibited higher Elixhauser comorbidity scores and increased likelihood of 30-day mortality. Patients identified by NLP algorithm but not ICD codes were more likely to have severe underlying conditions such as sepsis or acute kidney disease rather than traumatic injuries. Discussion: The NLP algorithm identifies many fall-related visits not identified by traditional methods. Conclusion: If the causal relationships between falls and comorbid conditions are not considered in NLP algorithms, they can easily identify patients who fell, but the fall was a sequela of underlying medical illness.

Indexed as

emergency medicinefallsnatural language processingtraumatic injuries

Identifiers

PMID40584739
PMCPMC12204729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.