ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work for cancer survivors: A systematic review.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of formal and informal organizational support with employed cancer survivors' intent to stay.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Generic and Disease-Specific Themes in Occupational Reflections of Patients in Cardiac, Cancer and Orthopedic Rehabilitation: An Interview Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity Engagement Among Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Global need, regional action: opportunities to improve cancer survivorship care in the Western Pacific.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze facilitators and barriers affecting cancer survivors' return to work based on the views of survivors and various stakeholders, using the social ecological model. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched in April 2025. Relevant studies and extracted data were selected by two researchers independently. Qualitative synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step process and drew on the five interrelated layers of the social ecological model. Results: Of 5535 initial studies, 13 qualitative studies were included. Intrapersonal factors consisted of personal characteristics, disease diagnosis, post-treatment physical symptoms, post-treatment emotional states, the perceived impacts of the disease and treatments on work, understanding of and attitudes toward work, and strategies for coping with return-to-work issues. Interpersonal factors included the opinions of employers and interpersonal relations at work, as well as interpersonal support. Organizational factors consisted of occupational return-to-work arrangements and occupational support. Community factors included community support and public cognition and atmosphere. Public policy factors included the dissemination of related policies, the deficiency of related legislation, and the impacts and implementation criteria of welfare policies. The differences between cancer survivors' and stakeholders' perspectives were compared. Conclusions: Multiple factors directly or indirectly influence cancer survivors' return-to-work decisions and experience. Cancer survivors should develop their awareness and learn more strategies in dealing with return-to-work problems. Stakeholders should care about the health status of cancer survivors, offering increased understanding and collaboration. Further studies should explore the relationships among the factors. Multi-component interventions are recommended to address return-to-work issues. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024555929.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.