ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Visual outcomes with a non-diffractive enhanced depth-of-focus IOL in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of the Capsular Bag on the Optical Performance of an IOL Measured in an Ex Vivo Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate visual function in eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) implanted with a non-diffractive enhanced depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) after cataract surgery. Design: Prospective, observational, non-randomized clinical study. Methods: Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients diagnosed with AMD and cataracts were submitted to standard cataract surgery with a non-diffractive EDOF IOL implantation (AcrySof IQ Vivity). We measured monocular uncorrected and best-corrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected- and distance-corrected-intermediate visual acuity (UIVA and DCIVA), uncorrected- and distance-corrected-near visual acuity (UNVA and DCNVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) and cylinder, monocular defocus curve and patient-reported outcome questionnaires (Catquest-9SF and NEI VFQ-25). Follow-up visits were carried out at 1, 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Results: At 6 months post-surgery all eyes were within ± 0.50 D with a mean MRSE of -0.19 ± 0.20 D, 95.45% had a refractive cylinder of ≤ 0.50 D with a mean cylinder of -0.24 ± 0.27 D. The mean values of postoperative monocular CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 0.02 ± 0.08, 0.16 ± 0.11, and 0.26 ± 0.15 logMAR, respectively. The defocus curve showed good visual acuity at distance and intermediate with a depth-of-focus of about 1.60 D. A total of 81.82% of patients did not report any difficulty with their vision in their everyday-life and 86.36% reported being quite satisfied to very satisfied with their current vision. The NEI VFQ-25 showed that all values improved significantly ( Conclusion: The use of a non-diffractive EDOF IOL in AMD eyes with cataracts is a safe and effective surgical approach for visually correcting aphakia, providing good visual acuity at far and intermediate distances. Our outcomes support the use of non-diffractive EDOF IOLs in patients with AMD diagnosed with cataracts aiming to obtain spectacle-independence at far and intermediate distances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.