Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584692›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025

Cancer registries in Pakistan: a scoping review.

Sehar Salim Virani, Kaleem Sohail Ahmed, Megan Springer, Muzamil Hussain, Leslie Christensen, Farah Asif, Shahid Pervez, Zehra Fadoo, Asim Belgaumi, Syed Nabeel Zafar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sehar Salim ViraniDepartment of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kaleem Sohail AhmedDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Megan SpringerUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Muzamil HussainMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Leslie ChristensenEbling Library for the Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Farah AsifDepartment of Clinical Research, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahid PervezDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zehra FadooDepartment of Oncology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asim BelgaumiDepartment of Oncology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Nabeel ZafarDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer incidence is increasing globally. Although Pakistan does not have a unified national cancer registry, several institutional and regional cancer registries can provide vital information for cancer planning. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases and grey literature. Data were extracted regarding registry characteristics, data collection methods, and study details, and findings were summarised narratively to highlight key attributes and data gaps. Of 3714 unique abstracts screened, 102 studies met inclusion criteria, including 92 reporting registry data and 10 describing registry characteristics without patient-level data. Seventeen cancer registries were identified, with varying scope and geographical coverage. Only 19 of Pakistan's 129 cities contribute data to at least one registry. Data collection methods ranged from paper-based forms to advanced software systems. The Karachi Cancer Registry was noted for its high research output. Funding sources were limited, and several registries faced operational challenges. This Review highlights Pakistan's fragmented cancer registry landscape. While important policy-level data can be obtained from existing registries, there is an urgent need for strategic efforts and stakeholder collaboration to establish a national cancer registry system. Such a system could enhance cancer surveillance, inform public health efforts, and serve as a model for similar initiatives in south and southeast Asia.

Indexed as

CancerCancer registryPakistanRegistryScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40584692
PMCPMC12205766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.