ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2025
Machine learning-based model for acute asthma exacerbation detection using routine blood parameters.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inflammatory score, intrinsic capacity and the risk of new-onset chronic lung disease: a cohort study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute asthma exacerbations (AAEs) are a leading cause of asthma-related morbidity and mortality, especially in resource-limited settings where pulmonary function tests are unavailable or when patients are unable to cooperate with testing. This study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic model for AAE using routine blood parameters through machine learning techniques. Methods: We developed a machine learning-based diagnostic model using routine blood test parameters. Data from 23,013 asthma patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were analyzed. Significant variables were identified through logistic regression, and 12 machine learning algorithms were used to construct diagnostic models, which were evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Results: The Generalized Linear Model Boosting combined with Random Forest (glmBoost + RF) algorithm using 14 variables achieved comparable performance (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.981) to the more complex Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator combined with Random Forest (Lasso + RF) algorithm using 25 variables (AUC = 0.985). Both models demonstrated excellent calibration and consistent performance across different demographic subgroups. DCA confirmed superior clinical utility compared to conventional strategies. Conclusions: This machine learning model provides an efficient and practical tool for detecting AAE using routine blood parameters, offering potential value in clinical practice, especially in resource-limited settings. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.