Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584682›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

The Integration and Growth of R in Soil Research: A 10-Year Analysis.

Meixiang Gao, Xiujuan Yan, Xin Li, Ye Zheng, Jiangshan Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meixiang GaoDepartment of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques Ningbo University Ningbo China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-9918
Xiujuan YanJilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences Changchun China.
Xin LiDepartment of Geography and Spatial Information Techniques Ningbo University Ningbo China.
Ye ZhengFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ningbo University Ningbo China.
Jiangshan LaiCollege of Ecology and Environment Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of soil science has seen significant advancements in recent years, largely due to the integration of computational tools and statistical methods. Among these resources, the programming language R has emerged as a powerful and versatile platform for soil scientists, aiding in a spectrum of tasks from data analysis and modeling to visualization. Nonetheless, the broader trends and specific patterns of R usage in soil research have not been thoroughly documented. Our study investigated the prevalence of R and its package usage in 25,888 research articles published in 10 leading soil science journals over a decade, from 2014 to 2023. A considerable number of these articles, 7899 (or 30.5%), named R as their primary data analysis tool. The use of R has followed a steady linear growth pattern, rising from 13.9% in 2014 to 46.5% in 2023. The most commonly used R packages were "vegan," "ggplot2," "lme4," "nlme," and "randomForest," with each journal showcasing unique research focuses, resulting in varying frequencies of R package applications across different publications. Furthermore, there was a notable increase in the average number of R packages used per article throughout the study period. This research highlights the pivotal role of R, armed with its robust statistical and visualization capabilities, in enabling soil scientists to conduct comprehensive analyses and gain in-depth insights into the complex dimensions of soil science.

Indexed as

R packagesR softwaresoil ecologysoil journalsoil science

Identifiers

PMID40584682
PMCPMC12202774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.