Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584673›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Coastal Shorebirds Delay Maturity More Than Inland Ones.

Danny I Rogers, Theunis Piersma, Clive D T Minton, Adrian N Boyle, Chris J Hassell, Ken G Rogers, Andrew Silcocks, Jorge S Gutiérrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sublethal Effects of Crude Oil Exposure Alter Population-Level Responses in an Individual Based Model of a Passerine Bird.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danny I RogersArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Energy Environment and Climate Action Heidelberg Victoria Australia.
Theunis PiersmaBirdEyes, Centre for Global Ecological Change at the Faculties of Science & Engineering and Campus Fryslân University of Groningen Leeuwarden the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-466X
Clive D T MintonVictorian Wader Study Group Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Adrian N BoyleAustralasian Wader Studies Group Melbourne Australia.
Chris J HassellAustralasian Wader Studies Group Melbourne Australia.
Ken G RogersAustralasian Wader Studies Group Melbourne Australia.
Andrew SilcocksBirdlife Australia Carlton Victoria Australia.
Jorge S GutiérrezDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Zoology, Faculty of Sciences University of Extremadura Badajoz Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8459-3162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delaying the age of first breeding will lower lifetime reproductive output unless compensated for by increased fecundity or survival. Yet, in many migratory shorebird species (Charadriiformes) individuals delay their first return migration to the breeding grounds until they are several years old. Using data from non-breeding and breeding season counts of shorebirds in the non-breeding areas, recaptures, and long-term banding studies, we assess the age of first return migration (as a measure of maturity) for 37 shorebird species that have migrated to Australian non-breeding grounds. We provide a comparative analysis of the association between the measure of maturity and habitat use during the non-breeding period, contrasting coastal and inland wetland habitats. After controlling for latitudinal and phylogenetic covariates, we found a positive relationship between body size and the age of first return migration. However, there was still a stronger relationship with the type of non-breeding habitat used. Coastal shorebird species delayed maturity more than species that spend the non-breeding season in non-tidal inland wetlands. This finding expands on previously identified ecological and physiological differences between coastal and inland shorebirds and leads to questions on the environmental characteristics embodied in the habitat contrast. We propose that the complicated tidal dynamics and differences in prey make it more difficult to become an individually competent coastal (rather than inland freshwater) forager.

Indexed as

Charadriicomparative biologydemographylife‐history strategieslife‐table variablemigrationover‐summeringwaders

Identifiers

PMID40584673
PMCPMC12203014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.