ArticleEcology and evolution2025
In Situ Thrust Measurement of Fish During Locomotion; Test Case: Sharks.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Situ Thrust Measurement of Fish During Locomotion; Test Case: Sharks.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel method of measuring thrust of aquatic animals using in situ video data of swimming motions. To demonstrate its utility, the method was applied to several large elasmobranch species, which are typically highly challenging to measure. Using motion tracking software, we analyzed video footage of wild and captive sharks to track their instantaneous position and speed. In order to estimate the force output, we used the tail/body motion based on the swimming modes of the fish to calculate the water displaced by this motion during locomotion. Using Newton 3rd law, we have calculated the instantaneous force exerted by the water on the shark. The force output, that is thrust was calculated by averaging the instantaneous force over the tailbeat cycle. The thrust, for each fish was converted into a nondimensional parameter defined as: scaled thrust, allowing comparisons independent of size based on prior knowledge of the fish length and mass. This scaled thrust was analyzed for various swimming modes and caudal fin morphology to correlate to behavioral features through principal component analysis (PCA) we demonstrate the coupling between morphological traits and hydrodynamic forces. For the species studied the ratio of the upper to lower lobe of the caudal fin (CLAR) emerged as a strong predictor of scaled thrust, accounting for more than 80% of the observed variation. Our findings for the species studied indicate that coastal pelagic species exhibited lower scaled thrust values than benthic species, suggesting that benthic species may be less efficient, expending more energy to remain aloft or compensate for drag relative to generating forward motion. We propose that the unique ecological niches of these species drive behavioral changes that result in morphological adaptations to optimize performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.