ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Exploring Treatment Approaches in Pediatric MOG Antibody-Associated Disease: A Survey of Neurologists.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Diagnostic criteria for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated diseases (MOGADs) were published in 2023, but debate regarding optimal therapeutic strategies for pediatric MOGAD exists. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment approaches and preferred diagnostic investigations for pediatric MOGAD among neurologists. Methods: A survey questionnaire focused on pediatric MOGAD treatment was launched through the Practice Current Section of Results: A total of 346 neurologists completed the survey (52.3% of general neurologists, 32.1% of NIs, and 15.6% in other neurology fields). Of all respondents, 90.5% chose to send serum MOG-IgG antibody after the first event (59.7% serum, 36.4% CSF + serum). For acute treatment, 84.1% chose to give a 3-5-day course of high-dose IV steroids. Approaches to steroid tapering varied, with 33.0% choosing a 2-4-week taper, 27.2% choosing a 7-12-week taper, and 21% not offering a steroid taper. 56.6% of non-NIs chose to initiate maintenance therapy after the first episode while only 18.9% of NIs chose to do so. After the second episode, 98.3% of all respondents recommended starting maintenance therapy, with rituximab (RTX) (37.1%) being the most frequently chosen agent, followed by monthly IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) (25.6%) and azathioprine (17.1%). NIs selected monthly IVIG (50%) over RTX (27.3%). The duration of treatment in relapsing cases varied: 42.9% elected to maintain treatment for 2 years or less and 35.3% for more than 2 years, and 21.8% chose to continue treatment indefinitely. Discussion: The survey demonstrated substantial variability in management decisions related to MOGAD among neurologists, reflecting current gaps in knowledge about therapies for MOGAD. Future efforts are needed to improve the uptake of knowledge and ensure that current guidelines are effectively translated into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.