ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Diagnostic Journey and Health Care Burden of Patients With Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in the United States: A Real-World Evidence Study.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary recommendations for palliative and supportive care in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and related disorders.Age and ageing · 2026Review
- Erratum: Diagnostic Journey and Health Care Burden of Patients With Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in the United States: A Real-World Evidence Study.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Evidence on the diagnostic journey and health care burden of patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in the United States is limited. A real-world evidence study using a US health care claims database was undertaken to address this gap. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases (01/2012-12/2020). Study population comprised adults aged 18 years or older with evidence of CJD (initial diagnosis = index date), no evidence of selected neurologic conditions after the last CJD diagnosis, and health care coverage during the 12-month pre-index period; adults meeting selection criteria are referred herein as "patients with CJD." Diagnostic journey was detailed based on evidence of symptoms and alternative neurologic conditions during the pre-index period as well as time to death (based on a proxy). Health care burden was summarized through levels of all-cause health care utilization and expenditures during the pre/post-index periods. Results: A total of 215 patients with CJD qualified for inclusion in the study population. The mean duration from first symptom to initial CJD diagnosis was 5.0 months, and 80% of patients had ≥3 symptoms, most commonly altered mental status (82%), gait/coordination disturbance (60%), and malaise/fatigue (44%). Most patients (63%) also had ≥1 alternative diagnosis, including cerebrovascular disease (49%), peripheral vertigo (11%), and Alzheimer disease (7%); the mean duration from first alternative diagnosis to initial CJD diagnosis was 2.4 months. The mean (median) time to death (proxy) from first symptom was 7.9 (6.6) months and from initial CJD diagnosis was 2.9 (1.1) months. During the 12-month pre-index period, mean (95% CI) cumulative health care expenditures were $35,493 ($28,914-$42,722); by the end of the post-index period, cumulative expenditures averaged $93,601 ($78,878-$109,776) per patient. Discussion: Study findings suggest that, in US clinical practice, patients with CJD present with one or more clinical symptoms affecting motor, cognitive, or other domains, and many alternative diagnoses are considered, which may prolong the diagnostic journey. Study findings also suggest that health care expenditures-especially proximate to the initial CJD diagnosis-are notably high. CJD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adults with rapidly progressing dementia or motor disturbance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.