Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584577›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

Machine learning integration of echocardiographic and clinical data to improve prediction of survival following myocardial infarction.

Sandhir B Prasad, Liam Scanlon, Anish Krishnan, Nicole Ivy Chan, Michael Mallouhi, William Vollbon, William Parsonage, Sankalp Khanna, Andrew Lin, John J Atherton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandhir B PrasadDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-9425
Liam ScanlonMonash Victorian Heart Institute and Monash Health Heart, Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash University, 631 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Anish KrishnanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-5861
Nicole Ivy ChanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Michael MallouhiQueensland Statewide Cardiac Network, Ministry of Health, 1 Butterfield Street, Queensland 4029, Australia.
William VollbonQueensland Statewide Cardiac Network, Ministry of Health, 1 Butterfield Street, Queensland 4029, Australia.
William ParsonageDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Sankalp KhannaThe Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, 296 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
Andrew LinMonash Victorian Heart Institute and Monash Health Heart, Victorian Heart Hospital, Monash University, 631 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
John J AthertonDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Machine learning (ML) could improve risk stratification following myocardial infarction (MI). However, previous ML studies for risk prediction following MI did not incorporate comprehensive echocardiographic data. This study sought to use machine learning (ML) to integrate comprehensive echocardiographic and clinical data for the predicting all-cause mortality following MI. Methods and results: Retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted with MI to a tertiary referral hospital, with echocardiography performed within 24 h of admission. The cohort was randomly split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Two ML models (XGBoost and a neural network) were developed using echocardiographic and clinical data, and then compared with conventional logistic regression. The Shapley Additive exPlanations method was used for ML model interpretation. In the final study population of 3202 patients (mean age, 63.2 ± 12.5 years; 29.2% females), ST-elevation MI was present in 28.8%, and the mean cohort LVEF was 52.5 ± 11.2%. At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, there were 465 deaths. In the test set, XGBoost achieved the highest performance (AUC, 0.854), compared with logistic regression (AUC, 0.824; Conclusion: ML integration of comprehensive echocardiographic data with clinical data could lead to improved prediction of survival following MI. Clinical implementation should be considered.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyMachine LearningMortalityMyocardial InfarctionRisk StratificationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40584577
PMCPMC12203351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.