Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584556›Full record

ArticleISME communications2025

Potential mode of action of multispecies inoculums on wheat growth under water stress.

Asmaâ Agoussar, Julien Tremblay, Étienne Yergeau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asmaâ AgoussarCentre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, 531 Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, QC H7V 1B7, Canada.
Julien TremblayCentre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, 531 Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, QC H7V 1B7, Canada.
Étienne YergeauCentre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, 531 Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, QC H7V 1B7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manipulating microbial communities could increase crop resistance to environmental stressors such as drought. It is, however, not clear what would be the best approach to do so and what microbial traits are important. Here, we first compare multispecies inoculums created using different approaches. The only inoculum that increased wheat fresh biomass under drought was the one created from 25 isolates that had showed a capacity to grow under high osmolarity. We then looked at two potential mechanisms of action of this inoculum: (i) direct action, by sequencing and screening the genomes of the inoculated bacteria, (ii) indirect action, by sequencing the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene and internal transcribed spacer region of rhizosphere, root, and leaves microbial communities. The microbes in the inoculum harbored many traits related to plant growth promotion, competition, and water stress resistance. The inoculation also resulted in significant shifts in the microbial communities associated with wheat, including some microorganisms (e.g.

Indexed as

droughtinoculummicrobial communitiesrhizospheresoilwheat

Identifiers

PMID40584556
PMCPMC12206444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.