ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Injury analysis of 257 hospitalized casualties of the Jishishan earthquake in Linxia Prefecture.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the characteristics of injuries sustained by casualties of the Jishishan earthquake in Jishishan County, Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Gansu Province, China. Methods: A descriptive research approach was employed. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed for earthquake-related injuries among patients admitted to the People's Hospital of Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, the People's Hospital of Jishishan County, and the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture. Results: A total of 257 patients were hospitalized: 142 at the People's Hospital of Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture, 91 at the People's Hospital of Jishishan County, and 24 at the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Linxia Hui Autonomous Prefecture. Most injuries occurred during the main shock (96.5%). In total, 802 injuries were diagnosed, with fractures accounting for 46.6%, followed by visceral injuries (12.0%). The thorax was the most frequently affected site (25.8%), followed by the head (19.5%). Dislocations primarily involved the shoulder-upper arm (50.0%), whereas soft tissue contusions were most common in the lower back (20.3%). Skin lacerations were primarily located on the head (44.7%). Visceral injuries mainly affected the thorax (77.1%), with crush injuries concentrated in the hip-thigh region (38.5%). Hematomas and hemorrhages were predominantly seen in the head (87.0 and 76.0%, respectively). Single fractures were most frequent in the thorax (21.2%) and pelvis (15.2%). Pelvic fractures were the most common single-region multiple fractures (10.5%), whereas thorax+lower back injuries (13.7%) were the most frequent multiple-region fractures. Lung contusions constituted 67.0% of visceral injuries. Conclusion: In the Jishishan earthquake, pelvic and thorax fractures were observed as the main injuries, reflecting the interaction between the vertical collapse mechanism and the vulnerability of the buildings in the earthquake area. This study suggests the need to optimize the allocation of emergency resources for combined thorax-lower back-pelvic injuries in the plateau environment and to enhance the retrofitting of earthquake-resistant buildings in rural areas to reduce the incidence of such injuries. The core findings of this study support empirical evidence for the regional specificity of the earthquake injury spectrum, providing key evidence for regionalized prevention and treatment of earthquake trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.