ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative care of infants and children with Hirschsprung disease.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mobile health applications for parents of children with Hirschsprung disease: a requirement analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) represents an innovative, protocol-driven perioperative care program designed to optimize patient outcomes. However, its application and efficacy in infants and children with Hirschsprung disease (HD) remain underexplored.
aimTo delve into the impact of ERAS on perioperative recovery and the overall medical experience in HD infants and children.
methodsThirty-eight infants and children with HD who received the Soave surgical procedure were enrolled in this case-control study. According to age- and sex-stratified single-blind randomized tables, 20 cases received ERAS treatment (ERAS group) and 18 cases received conventional treatment (control group). The two treatments were then compared in terms of perioperative recovery and medical experience.
resultsSignificant differences were observed in pain scores at awakening (4.2 ± 1.3
conclusionThe ERAS protocol has the potential to profoundly enhance postoperative recovery and significantly elevate the overall comfort and quality of the medical experience, making it an indispensable approach that warrants widespread adoption. Continuous refinement through evidence-based practices is anticipated to further optimize its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.