Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584483›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.

Yan-Ping Ma, Xue-Yong Zheng, Xin-Feng Shen, Yi-Ting Ling, Mei-Ping Qian, Min-Jun Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan-Ping MaEndoscopy Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xue-Yong ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xin-Feng ShenEndoscopy Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China. sxfsxf5036@163.com.
Yi-Ting LingDepartment of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Mei-Ping QianEndoscopy Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Min-Jun NiEndoscopy Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonoscopic polypectomy is a crucial procedure for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer, with its success and safety largely dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. Currently, polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution remains the standard method for bowel preparation, but its use may cause patient discomfort and incomplete cleansing.

aimTo evaluate impact of enhanced and conventional bowel preparation protocols on the outcomes of colonoscopic polypectomy.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study collected data from 130 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into the conventional bowel preparation group (

resultsThe enhanced group demonstrated significant advantages over the conventional group, with higher BBPS total scores (4.2 ± 0.7

conclusionThe enhanced bowel preparation protocol demonstrates significant advantages, particularly in improving surgical outcomes, reducing complications, and increasing patient satisfaction, underscoring its importance of its application during colonoscopic polypectomy.

Indexed as

Bowel preparationColonoscopic polypectomyComplicationsPatient satisfactionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40584483
PMCPMC12188597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.