Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584436›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2025

Comparison of cellular, mechanical, and optical properties of different polymers for corneal tissue engineering.

Sepehr Zamani, Javad Sadeghi, Mohammad Kamalabadi-Farahani, Seyede Nazanin Aghayan, Zohreh Arabpour, Ali R Djalilian, Majid Salehi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design of a Gelatin/Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel Containing Myrtus Communis Extract with Anti-inflammatory Capabilities for Accelerated Wound Healing; in Vitro and in Vivo Study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sepehr ZamaniStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Javad SadeghiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Kamalabadi-FarahaniDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Seyede Nazanin AghayanStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Zohreh ArabpourDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.
Ali R DjalilianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.
Majid SalehiDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The invention of corneal tissue engineering is essential for vision due to the lack of effective treatments and donated corneas. Finding the right polymer is crucial for reducing inflammation, ensuring biocompatibility, and mimicking natural cornea properties. Materials and Methods: In this study, solvent casting and physical crosslinking (freeze-thaw cycles) were used to fabricate polymeric scaffolds of Polyvinyl alcohol, alginate, gelatin, carboxymethyl chitosan, carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and their combinations. The mechanical evaluation of scaffolds for tension and suture ability was conducted. Biodegradability, swelling, water vapor, bacterial permeability, anti-inflammatory properties, blood compatibility, Blood Clotting Index (BCI), pH alterations, and cell compatibility with human Mesenchymal Stem cells (MSCs) were investigated with MTT. The hydrophilicity of the samples and the ability to adhere to surfaces were also compared with the contact angle and adhesive test, respectively. Finally, quantitative and qualitative analysis was used to check the transparency of the samples. Results: The mechanical strength of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone samples was highest, showing good suture ability. All samples had blood compatibility below 5% and cell compatibility above 75%. Polyvinyl alcohol was the most transparent at around 93%. Carboxymethyl chitosan effectively inhibited bacterial permeability, while its anti-inflammatory potential showed no significant difference. Conclusion: This study aims to choose the best polymer composition for corneal tissue engineering. The selection depends on the study's goals, like mechanical strength or transparency. Comparing polymers across different dimensions provides better insight for polymer selection.

Indexed as

Biocompatible polymersCorneaMesenchymal stem cellsSolvent castingTransparent scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID40584436
PMCPMC12203831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.