ArticleIranian journal of basic medical sciences2025
Comparison of cellular, mechanical, and optical properties of different polymers for corneal tissue engineering.
Article in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of a Gelatin/Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel Containing Myrtus Communis Extract with Anti-inflammatory Capabilities for Accelerated Wound Healing; in Vitro and in Vivo Study.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Potential of a Fast-Curing Polymer Bioadhesive Hydrogel for Corneal Defect Repair.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The invention of corneal tissue engineering is essential for vision due to the lack of effective treatments and donated corneas. Finding the right polymer is crucial for reducing inflammation, ensuring biocompatibility, and mimicking natural cornea properties. Materials and Methods: In this study, solvent casting and physical crosslinking (freeze-thaw cycles) were used to fabricate polymeric scaffolds of Polyvinyl alcohol, alginate, gelatin, carboxymethyl chitosan, carboxymethyl cellulose, polyacrylic acid, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and their combinations. The mechanical evaluation of scaffolds for tension and suture ability was conducted. Biodegradability, swelling, water vapor, bacterial permeability, anti-inflammatory properties, blood compatibility, Blood Clotting Index (BCI), pH alterations, and cell compatibility with human Mesenchymal Stem cells (MSCs) were investigated with MTT. The hydrophilicity of the samples and the ability to adhere to surfaces were also compared with the contact angle and adhesive test, respectively. Finally, quantitative and qualitative analysis was used to check the transparency of the samples. Results: The mechanical strength of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrrolidone samples was highest, showing good suture ability. All samples had blood compatibility below 5% and cell compatibility above 75%. Polyvinyl alcohol was the most transparent at around 93%. Carboxymethyl chitosan effectively inhibited bacterial permeability, while its anti-inflammatory potential showed no significant difference. Conclusion: This study aims to choose the best polymer composition for corneal tissue engineering. The selection depends on the study's goals, like mechanical strength or transparency. Comparing polymers across different dimensions provides better insight for polymer selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.