Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584425›Full record

ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2025

Recanalization of atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery.

Zhi-Long Zhou, Liang-Fu Zhu, Tian-Xiao Li, Bu-Lang Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi-Long ZhouStroke Center, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.
Liang-Fu ZhuStroke Center, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.
Tian-Xiao LiStroke Center, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.
Bu-Lang GaoStroke Center, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis is one of the major causes of posterior circulation ischemic strokes and may result in a high risk of recurrent stroke. Current treatment for vertebrobasilar stenosis comprises aggressive medication and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). Endarterectomy and intracranial-extracranial bypass surgery may be considered for large artery stenosis in the anterior circulation, but they may be deterred by some technical difficulties and great complication rates in the vertebrobasilar stenoses. PTAS may be good for eliminating the arterial stenosis and preventing recoil of arterial wall after balloon angioplasty alone, however, higher peri-procedural complications and poor follow-up outcomes prevent PTAS as a common treatment strategy. Nonetheless, for selected patients with severe (≥70 %) stenosis and non-acute occlusion of the intracranial vertebrobasilar artery refractory to the best medication, PTAS may be feasible, safe and effective if the treatment approaches and endovascular devices were tailored to the clinic-radiological features of each lesion and patient. Sub-satisfactory stenting recanalization of the stenosis using a balloon < 80 % of the diameter of the nearby normal artery for dilatation of the stenosis and selection of softer and more flexible stents and delivery systems may be advantageous in decreasing the peri-procedural complications. This study reviewed the concept of intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosis, available treatment modalities, peri-procedural complications, risk factors for endovascular treatment and prognosis, evidence for sub-satisfactory recanalization of the stenosis, and strategies to improve the peri-procedural complications and prognosis with the hope of improving the treatment outcome of endovascular recanalization.

Indexed as

AngioplastyEndovascular recanalizationIntracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic stenosisPosterior circulationStenting

Identifiers

PMID40584425
PMCPMC12203872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.