Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584421›Full record

ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2025

The emerging role of circulating tumor DNA in brain tumor research.

Amir Modarresi Chahardehi, Niki Faraji, Nikoo Emtiazi, Reza Nasiri, Maryam Daghagheleh, Helia Mohammadaein, Fatemeh Masoudi, Kimia Ghazi Vakili, Aylin Sefidmouy Azar, Hossein Fatemian and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amir Modarresi ChahardehiCoenzyme R Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Niki FarajiFaculty of Converging Sciences and Technologies, Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Nikoo EmtiaziDepartment of Pathology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza NasiriSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medial Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam DaghaghelehDepartment of Paramedicine Faculty, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Helia MohammadaeinFaculty of Medicine, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey.
Fatemeh MasoudiDepartment of Microbiology, Saba University of Urmia, Urmia, Iran.
Kimia Ghazi VakiliDepartment of Medicine, Tehran Medical Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Aylin Sefidmouy AzarFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hossein FatemianSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medial Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hossein MotedayyenAutoimmune Diseases Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Reza ArefnezhadStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh Rezaei-TazangiDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Zahra NiknamNeurophysiology Research Center, Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
Marziye Ranjbar TavakoliPharmaceutical Sciences and Cosmetic Products Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors provide considerable diagnostic and treatment challenges due to their intricate nature and the hazards linked to direct tissue biopsies. Owing to the restricted sensitivity and specificity of conventional procedures, new techniques like liquid biopsy have garnered attention. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), present in physiological fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma, has emerged as a viable instrument for non-invasive tumor characterization. Hence, advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR have enhanced the sensitivity of ctDNA detection, rendering it a feasible method for monitoring tumor dynamics and evaluating therapy responses. Research indicates that ctDNA strongly correlates with tumor heterogeneity, providing a superior alternative to single-site tissue biopsies. CSF, due to its proximity to the brain, offers elevated amounts of ctDNA for examination relative to plasma, particularly in central nervous system (CNS) cancers. Research indicates that ctDNA can detect actionable mutations, forecast little residual illness, and enable real-time monitoring of disease development and resistance. Notwithstanding these advantages, difficulties, including poor ctDNA yield and heterogeneity in detection methodologies persist. This review examines the clinical efficacy of ctDNA in brain tumor diagnosis, emphasizes technical developments in ctDNA analysis, and stresses the necessity for standardized methods. Comprehending the capabilities and constraints of ctDNA can facilitate the development of more accurate, individualized therapy approaches in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

Brain tumorCell free DNACirculating tumor DNAGlioblastomaGlioma

Identifiers

PMID40584421
PMCPMC12203871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.