ReviewIBRO neuroscience reports2025
The emerging role of circulating tumor DNA in brain tumor research.
Review in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Integrated longitudinal analysis of ctDNA, radiologic response, and tumor volume reveals spatial and temporal heterogeneity in advanced melanoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Brain Tumor Biomarkers: From Molecular Profiling to Liquid Biopsy and AI-Driven Detection.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- Molecular Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor-Derived DNA to Aid in the Diagnosis and Targeted Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- In-depth assessment of BRAF, NRAS, KRAS, EGFR, and PIK3CA mutations on cell-free DNA in the blood of melanoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibition.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Sonobiopsy for enrichment of circulating microRNAs in glioma patients.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors provide considerable diagnostic and treatment challenges due to their intricate nature and the hazards linked to direct tissue biopsies. Owing to the restricted sensitivity and specificity of conventional procedures, new techniques like liquid biopsy have garnered attention. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), present in physiological fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma, has emerged as a viable instrument for non-invasive tumor characterization. Hence, advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR have enhanced the sensitivity of ctDNA detection, rendering it a feasible method for monitoring tumor dynamics and evaluating therapy responses. Research indicates that ctDNA strongly correlates with tumor heterogeneity, providing a superior alternative to single-site tissue biopsies. CSF, due to its proximity to the brain, offers elevated amounts of ctDNA for examination relative to plasma, particularly in central nervous system (CNS) cancers. Research indicates that ctDNA can detect actionable mutations, forecast little residual illness, and enable real-time monitoring of disease development and resistance. Notwithstanding these advantages, difficulties, including poor ctDNA yield and heterogeneity in detection methodologies persist. This review examines the clinical efficacy of ctDNA in brain tumor diagnosis, emphasizes technical developments in ctDNA analysis, and stresses the necessity for standardized methods. Comprehending the capabilities and constraints of ctDNA can facilitate the development of more accurate, individualized therapy approaches in neuro-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.