ArticleJFMS open reports
Bicavitary involvement of feline eosinophilic sclerosing fibroplasia with intralesional methicillin-resistant
Article in JFMS open reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Case summary: A 4-year-old spayed female domestic shorthair cat was presented for evaluation of multiple abdominal masses and hyperglobulinemia. Thoracic radiographs and abdominal ultrasonography revealed a cranial abdominal mass with extension through the aortic hiatus of the diaphragm and into the caudodorsal mediastinum. A diagnosis of feline eosinophilic sclerosing fibroplasia (FESF) with intralesional methicillin-resistant Relevance and novel information: To the authors' knowledge, this case report is the first to describe extension of a primary FESF lesion through the diaphragm and is the first confirmed case of intralesional MRSA in an FESF lesion. In addition, this case is one of a growing number of reports of FESF lesions that do not involve the gastrointestinal tract. This case further contributes to the growing evidence that FESF should be considered as a differential diagnosis, in addition to neoplasia, feline infectious peritonitis or abscessation, in cats with masses, especially when there is concurrent hyperglobulinemia, a low albumin:globulin ratio and/or eosinophilia. This case also highlights the importance of considering this differential for masses outside the abdominal cavity, those involving both the chest and the abdomen, and those that do not involve the gastrointestinal tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.