Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584374›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Mechanical Evaluation of Epoxy Polymer Composites Reinforced with Areca Leaf Sheath Fiber.

M G Madhu, Kishor Buddha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M G MadhuMechanical Engineering Department, GITAM School of Technology, Bengaluru 561203, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7624-3109
Kishor BuddhaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, GITAM School of Technology, Bengaluru 561203, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5565-2714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural fibers offer several advantages, including renewability, environmental safety, lightweight properties, cost-effectiveness, and reliable mechanical performance, over artificial fibers. Areca leaf sheath fibers have been widely recognized for their versatility, which allows them to be flexible or brittle depending on their moisture content. This study investigates the mechanical performance of chemically treated areca sheath fiber-reinforced epoxy composites with different fiber lengths and compositions. The results demonstrated that the 15 mm fiber length and 30% fiber volume fraction composition are best compared to plywood, pure epoxy, and unprocessed areca fiber. We conducted chemical composition, FTIR, XRD, and simultaneous thermal analysis on unprocessed and processed areca sheath fibers. The findings showed that the epoxy composite reinforced with areca sheath fiber had much better mechanical qualities, with a tensile strength of 66.90 MPa, a compression strength of 31.02 MPa, a flexural strength of 80.17 MPa, an interlaminar shear strength of 2.50 MPa, and an impact strength of 9.89 kJ/m

Identifiers

PMID40584374
PMCPMC12198992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.