Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584372›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

A Straightforward Interpretation of Proximity Labeling through Direct Biotinylation Analysis.

Han Byeol Kim, Kwang-Eun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Han Byeol KimOrganelle Medicine Research Center, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Eun KimOrganelle Medicine Research Center, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-1979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximity labeling (PL) is a revolutionary tool in proteomics, enabling the precise identification of protein interactions in live cells. However, conventional statistical approaches for analyzing biotinylation data often lead to false positives, hindering the accuracy of the PL studies. In this study, we propose a direct biotinylation analysis approach that focuses on identifying only biotinylated peptides rather than relying solely on statistical comparisons. Using LC-MS data from a prior TurboID-based study, we reanalyzed secretome data sets and demonstrated significant improvements in identifying true biotinylated proteins with fewer false positives. By applying this approach to tissue-specific secretome data, we identified fibronectin (FN1) as a pericyte-specific marker. Our findings highlight that the limitations of traditional methods are insufficiently robust, and we advocate for the adoption of direct biotinylation analysis to enhance data reliability in PL-based proteomics. This methodology sets a new standard for studying protein interactions and secretomes, offering deeper insights into cellular- and tissue-specific molecular networks.

Identifiers

PMID40584372
PMCPMC12199003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.