ArticleACS omega2025
Study on the Coal Underground Gasification Reaction Characteristics Based on the Controlled Retraction Injection Point Gasification Process.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although modern coal underground gasification technology using the controlled retraction injection point (CRIP) has made significant advancements, several issues remain, such as unstable gas quality, limited process control methods, and an unclear understanding of the distribution and expansion of the gasification reaction zone. This study uses COMSOL Multiphysics software to establish a three-dimensional model of coal seam horizontal well injection underground gasification based on the CRIP process, with a focus on a single backward gasification reaction cycle. The distribution of temperature fields and the heat-affected zone of the combustion cavity during a single reaction cycle are analyzed under three parameters: gas flow rate, oxygen concentration, and gasification pressure. This study also investigates the variation in the coal seam heat-affected boundary and explores the underground gasification reaction characteristics of typical coal types. In this experiment, based on the gas composition and heat-affected zone size, the optimal gas flow rate and oxygen concentration are 0.45 m/s and 60%, respectively, at which the heat-affected boundary thickness is 0.08 m. The heat-affected boundary thickness of the coal seam increases with rising gasification pressure. At the gasification horizontal channel at 1.15 m, the heat-affected boundary thickness is 0.04 m at a gasification pressure of 0.1 MPa, while at 12.0 MPa, the heat-affected boundary thickness reaches 0.23 m, 5.75 times larger than at 0.1 MPa. By understanding the CRIP coal underground gasification reaction characteristics, this study provides scientific evidence to support the control and regulation of CRIP process operating parameters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.