ArticleACS omega2025
Rapid Identification of LED Phosphors by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the type of phosphor is a critical step in the light emitting diode (LED) e-waste recycling process. However, the similarities in color and chemical composition among different phosphors pose significant challenges for their accurate identification. In recent years, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and machine learning have shown great potential in the field of rapid material identification. In this study, the spectra of eight common LED phosphors (rare-earth phosphor, heavy-metal-containing phosphor, and common phosphor) were collected separately using LIBS, and based on these spectra, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) classification models were established for phosphor identification. The results show that both RF and SVM models have accuracy above 95%, while CNN showed the best prediction with the best accuracy of up to 99.47% for the test set for different types of phosphors. This study demonstrates the great potential of combining LIBS technology with CNN algorithms in the field of LED e-waste recycling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.