ArticleACS omega2025
Predictive Modeling of Yield Sooting Index Using Machine Learning with Uncertainty Estimation.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the development of two predictive models for the yield sooting index (YSI) of various fuels using the advanced capabilities of machine learning (ML), particularly multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks. Quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) methodology, which connects molecular structures with fuel properties, enables accurate predictions of fuel behavior, including YSI, kinematic viscosity, ignition temperature, and cetane and octane numbers. By utilizing feature selection techniques such as Gini importance and genetic algorithms, we identified key molecular descriptors that significantly impact YSI. Remarkably, the genetic algorithm model outperformed the Gini importance model by effectively reducing autocorrelation among features, thereby enhancing the accuracy of predictions. The reliability of these models was further validated through uncertainty estimation at different significance levels, which provided deeper insights into their performance. Additionally, we identified a strong relationship between certain 2D matrix-based descriptors and YSI, which offers a fresh perspective on predicting fuel properties. This comprehensive approach, incorporating rigorous data preprocessing, feature selection, and hyperparameter tuning, demonstrated the robustness of the developed predictive models. This work highlights the potent synergy between ML and QSPR theory in advancing the prediction of fuel properties. It not only refines current predictive models but also sets the stage for future computational advancements in fuel research, which contributes to the broader goal of developing sustainable and efficient fuel alternatives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.