ReviewACS omega2025
Sustainable Integration of Nanobiosensors in Biomedical and Civil Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensitive detection of unopposed estrogen using estrogen receptor functionalized nanoprobes for cancer diagnosis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Advanced biomaterial strategies for cancerous wound management from palliative to multifunctional platforms.iScience · 2026Review
- Carbon Dot-Based Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Pharmaceutical Analysis and Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Nanobiosensors for Single-Molecule Diagnostics: Toward Integration with Super-Resolution Imaging.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Multianalyte nano-biosensor diagnostics: advances through microfluidic and AI integration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanobiosensors represent a rapidly advancing class of analytical tools, offering high sensitivity, selectivity, and real-time detection across biomedical, environmental, and structural domains. This review synthesizes foundational quantum phenomena governing sensor response at the nanoscale and explores the integration of pH-responsive polymers to enhance specificity and functional adaptability. Key methodologies in nanobiosensor design and fabrication are examined, encompassing electrochemical, optical, piezoelectric, and field-effect transistor-based systems. Emphasis is placed on diverse applications, including early disease detection, real-time structural integrity assessment, and monitoring of environmental contaminants. Technical challenges such as material stability, signal drift, and manufacturing scalability are critically analyzed alongside emerging advantages such as multiplexing, miniaturization, and low power demand. A sustainable perspective is introduced through discussions on eco-friendly materials, life cycle assessment, and green fabrication processes. By consolidating recent advancements and interdisciplinary approaches, this work provides strategic insights for the development of next-generation nanobiosensors with enhanced performance, environmental compatibility, and translational potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.