Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584301›Full record

ReviewAnalytical science advances2025

Recent Advances in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) Applications in Biological and Applied Sciences.

Samyah Alanazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Emerging Role of N-Acetylaspartate in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Identification of Metabolites and Antioxidant Constituents fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samyah AlanaziClinical Laboratory Sciences Department College of Applied Medical Sciences King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a highly sophisticated analytical technique that has become indispensable for sample analysis across various scientific domains. In recent years, LC-MS has emerged as a cornerstone technology in comparative replicate sample analysis, particularly in the fields of proteomics, lipidomics and metabolomics. This review provides a comprehensive and in-depth exploration of LC-MS applications in biological, and applied sciences from the key aspects include (1) a historical perspective on LC-MS development and advancements; (2) its critical role in forensic investigations and environmental science; (3) its applications in food safety, quality control and pharmaceutical analysis and (4) its significance in the examination of pharmaceuticals and biological specimens. By presenting a broad and integrated understanding of LC-MS, this review underscores its transformative impact on life sciences and its expanding role in scientific research and innovation.

Indexed as

food analysis | life science | liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) | omics | pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID40584301
PMCPMC12204688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.