ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Marstacimab for the Treatment of Hemophilia A or B.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory Challenges in the Era of Novel Haemophilia Therapies.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Hemophilia in Mexico: Updated Consensus Recommendations on Diagnosis, Treatment and Gene Therapy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current Status of Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia and Globin Disorders.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Review
- Perceptions and Recommendations Regarding Haemophilia B Gene Therapy: A Multistakeholder View From Patients, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia A and B, caused by deficiencies of coagulation factors VIII or IX, result in impaired thrombin generation with consequent spontaneous or trauma-related bleeding, particularly hemarthroses. Although prophylactic factor replacement therapy remains the global standard of care for hemophilia, it has significant limitations, including intravenous administration, breakthrough bleeding, inhibitor development, and deteriorating arthropathy despite prophylaxis. Marstacimab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), represents a novel non-factor approach. Marstacimab restores thrombin generation via the extrinsic pathway, bypassing intrinsic pathway deficiencies and offering prophylactic benefit independent of inhibitor status. Clinical evaluation across Phase 1b/2 and Phase 3 (BASIS) trials and ongoing extension studies has demonstrated robust efficacy. In Phase 3, marstacimab reduced annualized bleed rates by 91.6% compared with episodic treatment and was non-inferior to factor prophylaxis. Bleed control was sustained though zero-bleed outcomes were not uniformly achieved. Pharmacokinetic data support once-weekly fixed dosing independent of body weight, simplifying administration and potentially improving adherence. Across all studies, marstacimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Injection site reactions were the most common adverse events, while anti-drug antibodies, including neutralizing types, were transient and without clinical impact. Marstacimab, the first FDA-approved anti-TFPI antibody for prophylaxis in hemophilia A and B without inhibitors, addresses key unmet needs, particularly for hemophilia B patients lacking subcutaneous (SC) prophylaxis options. Its novel mechanism, ease of administration, and sustained efficacy position it as a significant therapeutic advance. Marstacimab's exact role in the hemophilia treatment armamentarium is yet to be established with the availability of coming real-world experience data. The long-term studies remain essential to fully demonstrate its role, especially in populations with inhibitors and in the context of evolving non-factor therapies. This review summarises currently available clinical data and contextualises these in light of other treatments in hemophilia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.