ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Climate and Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Retrospective and Multi-Site Study in the High Desert of the United States.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: While numerous studies have investigated associations between meteorological factors and the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), findings remain inconclusive. We have identified key limitations in establishing this relationship due to confounding bias in prior research. This retrospective, observational study aims to address these gaps by minimizing residual confounding bias, focusing exclusively on patients aged ≥65 to limit seasonal recreational activity as a risk factor, and using incidence ratio calculations to account for patient intake fluctuations. This study explores these dynamics within the distinct climatic conditions of Las Vegas, Nevada, characterized by intense summer heat, cold winters, and low humidity. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed across four Retina Consultants of Nevada locations from December 2020 to November 2023. The study included patients aged ≥65 diagnosed with a primary RRD. Exclusion criteria were non-residency, recurrent RRD, and comorbid retinal conditions. Monthly RRD incidence ratios were calculated relative to all new patients seen for retinal conditions in the same age group. Environmental data (temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, UV index) were obtained from national meteorological databases. Correlations between meteorological factors and RRD incidence were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: Among 308 patients (mean age 72.4 years (SD=5.93), 59.7% male, p=0.0006), no significant correlations were found between RRD incidence and average monthly temperature (r=0.004, p=0.982), barometric pressure (r=-0.047, p=0.786), humidity (r=0.15, p=0.368), or UV index (r=0.072, p=0.68). Seasonal analysis showed a non-significant trend of higher RRD incidence during colder months (r=-0.70, p=0.30). Laterality (right eye: 53.2%) was also not statistically significant (p=0.254). Conclusion: This study's strength lies in addressing confounding factors by focusing on an older, less active population and using incidence ratios to adjust for patient intake fluctuations. The findings challenge prior reports by showing no significant association between meteorological factors and RRD incidence, suggesting a limited role for environmental variables in older subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.